Difference between revisions of "Grammar Squib - The Complex Passive in Danish"
(→Differences between complex passives in Norwegian and Danish) |
(→Differences between complex passives in Norwegian and Danish) |
||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
Lars Hellan, L., 2001. ''Complex Passive Constructions in Norwegian'', Manuscript, NTNU. | Lars Hellan, L., 2001. ''Complex Passive Constructions in Norwegian'', Manuscript, NTNU. | ||
+ | |||
Ørsnes, B., 2006. ''Creating Raising Verbs - An LFG-analysis of the Complex Passive in Danish'', CSLI online publications. | Ørsnes, B., 2006. ''Creating Raising Verbs - An LFG-analysis of the Complex Passive in Danish'', CSLI online publications. |
Revision as of 15:10, 5 June 2010
Complex Passives in Danish
Bibliography:
Differences between complex passives in Norwegian and Danish
In Norwegian the active participles used in complex passives have the same argument structure as their corresponding nominal modifiers. Løpt as a two-place predicate occurs in complex passive constructions and as a pre-nominal modifier in Norwegian. The intransitive verb løpt does neither occur as pre-nominal modifier, nor in complex passives.
Participles in the Danish complex passives are always past participles, and they do not occur as pre-nominal modifiers. The Danish intransitive løbet can be used in a complex passive construction, but it never occurs as a pre-nominal modifier. Further, I doubt that a Danish two place predicate like løbet is allowed in complex passives, unless the DIR-argument is a predicate itself with its own argument structure.
Norwegian: løpt [AGENT,DIR] løpt [AGENT]
Danish: løbet [AGENT,DIR] løbet [AGENT]
In Norwegian, participles based on unaccusative verbs are allowed in complex passive constructions. This is not the case in Danish.
Bibliography:
Lars Hellan, L., 2001. Complex Passive Constructions in Norwegian, Manuscript, NTNU.
Ørsnes, B., 2006. Creating Raising Verbs - An LFG-analysis of the Complex Passive in Danish, CSLI online publications.